Uber for Legal Services

The legal team can also have a huge impact by simply not losing. • The “Text a Lawyer” mobile platform, scheduled to launch in September, will allow potential clients to ask lawyers an initial legal question for about $20 and then $9 for follow-up questions. “I`m trying to bridge the gap between lawyers, at hundreds of dollars an hour that American workers can`t afford. with what they can afford,” says Kevin Gillespie, the app`s creator based in Portland, Oregon. (Legaltech News) founder Gillespie says he was inspired to launch Text A Lawyer when he was a student at Vermont Law School after taking the legal hacktivist course taught by Jeannette Eicks, co-director of the school`s Center for Legal Innovation. had visited. Eicks serves on the advisory board of Text A Lawyer. Lawber will be a digital marketplace for the purchase of legal services. By mapping with real, actionable data, including efficiency, quality, availability, cost, satisfaction, etc., Lawber would find the right lawyer to help you resolve your legal problem. This includes hiring former lawyers, data scientists, researchers and legal technologists for core teams that support our practices so we can find and apply the right solutions to improve the way we deliver legal services. This includes rigorous documentation of our work, from a robust document management system for client documents to best practice checklists and knowledge bases curated by dedicated lawyers for professional support.

According to Günther, trends in legal technology have increased competition while eliminating many inefficiencies. It is important to note that these developments are still in their infancy. Many cookie-cutter transactions use templates and do not account for certain variables or exceptions. Therefore, nuanced transactions with Legal Tech can incur high costs if executed poorly. Günther points out that complicated legal procedures “require experienced lawyers, judgment and discretion. Just as you don`t want to indulge yourself, you certainly don`t want to be a defender of yourself. As these legal technology services evolve, it is crucial that clients are aware of the risks involved. This includes reviewing our time tracking and budgeting practices and evaluating areas where an AI solution can help us become smarter in those areas. This includes investing in an enterprise-wide business intelligence solution that connects all of our systems and helps us determine which data points are useful to our lawyers, business people and even our clients. These platforms serve both consumers and legal professionals by simplifying the process of searching for and accessing legal services through an online marketplace. Dealing with legal issues is, of course, much more complex than driving a taxi.

But the analogy between industries – from the customer`s perspective – is simple. Similar to the inconvenience of taxi services before Uber, legal customers are frustrated by costs and a lack of transparency and efficiency. Just like when you`re driving in a metered taxi and wondering if the driver is taking the optimal route, your customers often wonder if all those billable hours are needed. The legal services industry is not immune to the trends we see all around us. With that in mind, Oz`s LinkedIn article reflects what`s going on, likely radically showing the awareness that the delivery of legal services will almost certainly change at some point in the future. Platforms like these offer a return on investment to consumers and optimize access to traditional legal services through a digital channel that was previously offline. One obvious problem I foresee is that while the app is designed for “simple” legal issues, consumers may not know if their question is simple. Gillespie`s answer to this question is that the lawyer answering the question can give a short answer explaining that the consumer should consult a lawyer for a more detailed answer. Consumers pay $20 to file a legal question.

Once consumers open the app, they are asked to select the state they live in and the type of lawyer they are looking for (family, criminals, immigration, etc.). Then they are asked to describe their question in a few sentences. A final screen is a conflict check, asking for the names of all alleged victims, opposing parties and witnesses, as well as the consumer`s relationship with one of these people. Platforms like these provide a return on investment for law firms and help lawyers work better and faster. Theoretically, legal clients should currently be able to differentiate their potential provider in terms of quality of service, but this is difficult for them, especially in the area of consumer legal services. As you might expect, I`d always like to applaud the fact that legal project management is described as a way to make law firms “more efficient and indispensable to clients.” However, the reference to an Uber-like model makes me uncomfortable. Looking at the responses to Oz`s LinkedIn article, I`m not the only one who feels this way. MyCase – MyCase provides law firm management software for boutique law firms.

The interface is unique in that it promotes expedited services and effective case management. These services range from $39 per month for lawyers to $29 per month for paralegals. Whether you believe Lawber is coming or not, we want to make sure our lawyers reach the top through the quality of their work and the efficient and transparent delivery of our services, resulting in very satisfied clients. Because we believe that our customers want and deserve it and that they will reward us for it. The goal, says founder Kevin Gillespie, is to make it easy for low- and middle-income consumers to get answers to legal questions. Text messaging is a way many are comfortable with, he says, and it has the added benefit of providing both the consumer and the lawyer with a transcript of the questions and answers. How do we – clients, lawyers and everyone else in the legal services industry – want the future to look like in practice? What steps can we take to make our vision for the future a reality? • Keila Ravelo, a former partner at Hunton & Williams and Willkie Farr & Gallagher, was banned in New York for authorizing payments of nearly $8 million to her ex-inmate`s companies in exchange for “little or no services.” Ravelo faces a conviction for federal electronic fraud and tax evasion. (Bloomberg law via BLB) Written by Ilhana Redzovic (email) and editing by Kaesha Freyaldenhoven (email). If you are interested in legal technology, contact David Guenther here.

In my opinion, Text A Lawyer could be a win-win situation for consumers and lawyers. For consumers, this could allow them to get immediate answers to simple legal questions at low cost and with little effort. For lawyers, this could provide a new source of income for those who work from home or are not currently working.

0982 432 436